Energy from Waste

Energy from Waste (EfW) refers to the process of generating energy—typically electricity and/or heat—by burning waste materials or converting them into fuel. It’s a waste management solution that recovers value from waste that would otherwise go to landfill.

If users want to assess the emissions impact of their waste management practices, they can consult WRAP’s Carbon Waste and Resources Metric. However, it’s important to note that this metric is not designed for reporting Scope 3 emissions. For more information about principles for GHG accounting and reporting and three “scopes” of emissions, please visit EN1 Measuring Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions.

EN2.4

Energy from Waste

Environment
  • Waste Management

Key Value

92

The monetised environmental value of carbon emission per tonne of waste diverted by energy from waste.

PLEASE NOTE: This value is not a “footprint” (i.e. carbon emissions) but a relative measure that can be used to quantify the additional emissions relative to any given treatment option for a given material / treatment combination.

The values are based on CarbonWARM2 which is the latest version of the Carbon Waste and Resources Metric developed by WRAP on behalf of Defra. This updated version provides conversion factors that enable organisations to assess the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with waste management practices, expressed in carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e). It serves as an essential tool for evaluating and improving waste management strategies.

The metric values are shown below. The value represents a carbon emission, while negative values represent a carbon saving.

Table 1 Carbon WARM, unnormalised values (tonnes.CO2e/tonne)

Material tonnes.CO2e/tonne
Paper  -0.194
Cardboard -0.198
Glass 0.023
Steel 0.018
Aluminium 0.023
PET rigid 1.606
HDPE rigid 2.288
Rigid plastics average 1.729
Film plastics average 1.527
Wood -0.318
Textiles 0.428
Kitchen waste -0.059
Garden waste -0.081
Mixed organics -0.077
Furniture -0.311
Electricals – all 0.45
WEEE – Large household 0.303
WEEE – Refrigeration 0.469
WEEE – Small household 0.751
WEEE – IT and telecoms 0.59
WEEE – Consumer 0.476
WEEE – Display screen 0.664
Batteries – alkaline 0.018
Batteries – NiMh 0.018
Batteries – lithium 0.018
Sanitary & AHP 0.105
Misc combustible 0.567
Misc non combustible 0.119
Rubble and aggregate 0.023
Incinerator bottom ash 0
Average 0.366

 

These numbers likely represent the amount of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) emissions or savings relative to landfill associated with each material. The higher the value, the greater the environmental impact. For example, paper and board have a relatively high footprint compared to dense plastics. The average Carbon footprint for Energy from waste is 366kg.CO2e per tonne.

According to the 2021 carbon values from DESNZ/BEIS, Carbon values in 2020 prices per tonne of CO2: central series for 2023 is £252 or 25.2p per kgCO2e. For more information, please visit MeasureUp EN1 Measuring Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions.

Average carbon emission per tonne of waste for energy from waste is 366 kg.CO2e and Carbon values in £2020 prices per kg of CO2 is £0.252. Thus, the headline value is 366kg.CO2e*£0.252= £92 per tonne of waste for energy from waste.

Local Needs Analysis Data Source

Before using this MeasureUp value, we encourage you to assess the local need in relation to the activity or outcome.

Here is the most useful initial data source for assessing local need in relation to this value.

To assess local needs related to the value EN2.4 ‘Energy from waste’, use the Household Recycling Rate from the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA). This indicator reflects the percentage of household waste that is recycled instead of sent to landfill. It is updated annually and available at local authority and regional levels, helping to evaluate the effectiveness of local waste management and sustainability efforts.

Bronze

Effort

Accuracy

Monetised value:

The monetised environmental value of carbon emission per tonne of waste diverted by energy from waste.

At the Bronze level, you should measure the amount of waste you have diverted by energy from waste, and use this to calculate the approximate carbon footprint of your diverted waste.

Here is an example

Assume as an organization you diverted 100 tonne of waste by producing energy from waste. If you don’t know material of the waste, you can approximately calculate monetised value of the energy from waste as (100tonne*
366
kg.CO2e) *£0.252= £9,200.

This value represents carbon emissions for energy from waste.

Silver

Effort

Accuracy

At the Silver level, you should measure the amount of waste you have diverted by energy from waste by each type of material and use this to calculate the approximate carbon footprint of your diverted waste.

Table 1 Carbon WARM, unnormalised values (tonnes.CO2e/tonne)

Material tonnes.CO2e/tonne
Paper  -0.194
Cardboard -0.198
Glass 0.023
Steel 0.018
Aluminium 0.023
PET rigid 1.606
HDPE rigid 2.288
Rigid plastics average 1.729
Film plastics average 1.527
Wood -0.318
Textiles 0.428
Kitchen waste -0.059
Garden waste -0.081
Mixed organics -0.077
Furniture -0.311
Electricals – all 0.45
WEEE – Large household 0.303
WEEE – Refrigeration 0.469
WEEE – Small household 0.751
WEEE – IT and telecoms 0.59
WEEE – Consumer 0.476
WEEE – Display screen 0.664
Batteries – alkaline 0.018
Batteries – NiMh 0.018
Batteries – lithium 0.018
Sanitary & AHP 0.105
Misc combustible 0.567
Misc non combustible 0.119
Rubble and aggregate 0.023
Incinerator bottom ash 0
Average 0.366

Here is an example

Assume and as an organisation you diverted 100 tonne of paper from landfill and 100 tonne of wood. Thus, you can approximately calculate monetised value of energy from waste as ((100tonne* 194kg.CO2e) +(100tonne* 318kg.CO2e)) *£0.252= 12,902.4

This value represents carbon savings for energy from waste.

Gold

Effort

Accuracy

At the Gold level, you would be expected to

  • Measure more accurately using more specific data for you in-scope activities.
  • Track the emissions or savings over time.

This will allow you to show your actual results over time against your estimates as outlined in Bronze and Silver.  Think of this as assessing your forecast or budget against your actuals.

Here is an example

A construction company is assessing the environmental impact of its annual energy from waste across different materials relative to landfill.

Material Tonnes2023 Tonnes2024 Monetised Value in 2023 Monetised Value in 2024
Glass 50 75 (50 × 23) × £0.252 = £289.80 (75 × 19) × £0.252 = £359.10
Steel 100 120 (100 × 28) × £0.252 = £705.60 (120 × 14) × £0.252 = £423.36
Aluminium 100 80 (100 × 23) × £0.252 = £579.60 (80 × 19) × £0.252 = £383.04
PET rigid 500 400 (500 × 1606) × £0.252 = £202,056.00 (400 × 1602) × £0.252 = £161,404.80
Total £203,631.00 £162,570.30

The monetised value of the reduction in carbon emissions from 2023 to 2024 is – £41,060.7 for energy from waste.

Support in developing your Gold survey approach is available through the Measure Up partners, so please do reach out to Impact, State of Life or PRD.

Value Type: Activity What's this?
UN SDG Categories:
  • 11. Sustainable Cities and Communities
  • 13. Climate Action
  • 15. Life on Land
What's this?
2020 Social Value Models:
    • MAC 4.1 Additional environmental benefits
    • MAC 4.2 Influence environmental protection and improvement
    • Policy Outcome 4: Effective stewardship of the environment
    • Theme 3: Fighting Climate Change
What's this?
2025 Social Value Models:
What's this?

Evidence

Measure Up focuses on empowering you to numerically measure the impact you’re having. We recommend that numeric reports are backed up with stories and other types of evidence to help illustrate, in human terms, the impact that’s being made on individuals.

We recommend seeking consent from participants in your intervention to collect and tell their story. This should include a little background on the participant, a summing up of life before the intervention, the human impact of the intervention, and the longer term (if known) impact on the person’s life outside of, and after, the intervention.

Providing photographs, audio recordings, video interviews or even artefacts from the intervention (for example, writing, paintings, music from creative interventions) can add more to the story, and convey the emotional impact of interventions more directly.

In some cases it’s appropriate to anonymise or abbreviate the personal information of case study participants. No story should be published or shared without the recorded consent of the individual(s) it concerns. Individuals continue to own the rights to their stories and if they request you stop sharing the story or making it available online you should do so promptly and without need for justification.

More help

We want to empower anyone to perform and improve their impact measurement – without needing a degree in economics.

If you need any more help, or just someone to do the legwork for you we can help signpost you to software, training and consultancy to help you get to grips with the impact you’re having and value you are creating.